Re-analysis of GEO Datasets GSE286094 & GSE286095
ATG7 Deficiency Reshapes Microglia Biology in Alzheimer’s Disease
Integrated single-cell and bulk RNA-seq analysis of Cai et al. 2025 (JEM)
Dataset: GSE286094 / GSE286095 · Mus musculus · Microglia · Atg7 fl/fl vs Atg7 dMG · 5xFAD AD model · 11 scRNA-seq + 6 bulk RNA-seq samples
Executive Summary
30
Key Findings
22 high confidence
5
Analysis Tracks
Quality → Trajectory → DE → Regulatory → Validation
28
Novel / Extending
17 orthogonal, 11 extending
6
Integrative Themes
Cross-cutting biological mechanisms
Novelty Classification
Of 30 key findings, 17 are entirely novel (orthogonal to prior work), 11 extend published results with new mechanistic detail, and 2 confirm established findings. Zero findings contradict the original study.
Integrative Themes
UPR-Ferroptosis Double Vulnerability
UPR impairment (especially ATF6) and ferroptosis susceptibility are anti-correlated at the single-cell level, creating coordinated vulnerability
5 supporting findings
DAM Signaling Desert & Communication Isolation
DAM cells experience coordinated shutdown of growth/survival pathways and lose twice as many intercellular interactions as they gain
5 supporting findings
Non-Functional Overexpression Pattern
Esr1 gene massively upregulated but TF activity paradoxically down; similar disconnect in JAK-STAT (gene up, signaling down)
2 supporting findings
Homeostatic Microglia Bifurcation
ATG7 loss splits homeostatic microglia into hyperactive (depleted) and senescent (accumulating) sub-populations with distinct signaling profiles
3 supporting findings
Non-Cell-Autonomous Immune Remodeling
Microglia-intrinsic autophagy loss remodels the brain immune landscape with selective cell type effects
3 supporting findings
Additive Biology with Pathway Saturation
Gene-level effects are additive but translation/ribosome pathways show sub-additivity, suggesting compensatory capacity saturation
2 supporting findings
Data Quality & Processing
90,475
Cells Retained
from 96,376 input
93.9%
Retention Rate
5,901 cells removed
2,884
Doublets Removed
3.0% of total
15,310
Genes Retained
3,000 HVGs selected
5
Bulk Samples
of 6 input (1 excluded)
wt3
Outlier Excluded
26× lower sequencing depth
scRNA-seq Cell Counts: Before vs After QC
QC filters applied: ≥500 genes, ≥1,000 UMIs, ≤10% mitochondrial reads, plus doublet removal via scrublet. AD_WT2 had the highest doublet rate (6.8%), while WT1 had the lowest (0.03%).
Bulk RNA-seq Library Sizes
Sample wt3 has only 3.8% of the median library size (1.26M vs 33.2M), making it an extreme outlier that was excluded from downstream analysis. Sample ko2 (3.8M) is low-depth but retained with monitoring.
Per-Sample QC Metrics
| Sample | Group | Pre-filter | Post-filter | Removed | Retention % | Doublets | Med. Genes | Med. UMI | Med. Mito % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AD_KO1 | Atg7_dMG-5xFAD | 7,322 | 6,782 | 540 | 92.6% | 179 | 1,475 | 3,437 | 1.29% |
| AD_KO2 | Atg7_dMG-5xFAD | 5,954 | 5,646 | 308 | 94.8% | 58 | 1,479 | 3,686 | 1.54% |
| AD_KO3 | Atg7_dMG-5xFAD | 6,477 | 6,167 | 310 | 95.2% | 146 | 1,396 | 2,942 | 1.34% |
| AD_WT1 | Atg7fl/fl-5xFAD | 10,513 | 9,927 | 586 | 94.4% | 336 | 1,474 | 3,557 | 1.43% |
| AD_WT2 | Atg7fl/fl-5xFAD | 16,276 | 14,573 | 1,703 | 89.5% | 1,099 | 1,274 | 2,893 | 1.48% |
| KO1 | Atg7_dMG | 13,745 | 12,465 | 1,280 | 90.7% | 806 | 1,273 | 2,562 | 1.34% |
| KO2 | Atg7_dMG | 5,944 | 5,590 | 354 | 94% | 111 | 1,248 | 2,367 | 1.23% |
| KO3 | Atg7_dMG | 5,855 | 5,554 | 301 | 94.9% | 113 | 1,434 | 2,909 | 1.23% |
| WT1 | Atg7fl/fl | 12,005 | 11,805 | 200 | 98.3% | 4 | 1,500 | 3,213 | 1.14% |
| WT2 | Atg7fl/fl | 8,494 | 8,280 | 214 | 97.5% | 12 | 1,558 | 3,455 | 1.29% |
| WT3 | Atg7fl/fl | 3,791 | 3,686 | 105 | 97.2% | 20 | 1,439 | 2,842 | 1.36% |
Batch Integration Quality
3,000
HVGs Selected
30
scVI Latent Dims
20
Epochs Trained
816.6
Final Train ELBO
scVI integration (30 latent dims, 2 layers, negative binomial likelihood) successfully corrected batch effects across 11 samples while preserving biological variation. ELBO converged rapidly over 20 epochs, indicating stable model training.
High-Quality Input Data
The low overall cell loss (93.9% retention) and low median mitochondrial content (1.3%) indicate the scRNA-seq data was already high quality from the 10x pipeline. Doublet rates varied substantially, with AD_WT2 (6.8%) and KO1 (5.9%) highest, likely reflecting higher cell loading densities.
Bulk Outlier Exclusion
Sample wt3 was excluded due to a 26× lower sequencing depth that would bias DESeq2 size factor estimation and inflate false discovery rates. After exclusion, the 5-sample design (2 WT + 3 KO) retains adequate power, with PC1 (50.1%) capturing genotype differences.
Cell Atlas & Composition
27
Cell Types
at resolution 0.8
64.3%
Microglia
58,135 cells
8.7%
DAM Fraction
7,868 cells
5.7×
DAM Enrichment
5xFAD vs non-5xFAD
Leiden clustering at resolution 0.8 identified 27 clusters annotated into 12 distinct cell type categories using a hierarchical two-pass approach. Microglia comprise 64.3% of all cells, with 6 homeostatic sub-clusters (HM_1–HM_6) revealing greater heterogeneity than typically reported. DAM cells show 5.7× enrichment in 5xFAD groups, confirming disease-associated microglial activation. Non-microglia populations including neutrophils (9.8%), T cells (8.3%), and B cells (5.2%) were entirely unexplored by the original authors.
Cell Type Composition Across Genotype Groups
Percentage of each cell type across experimental groups. DAM is markedly expanded in 5xFAD groups (10.3–21.9%) while HM_1 dominates in Atg7fl/fl controls (48.9%). Hover to see individual cell type percentages.
Cell Type Marker Scores by Cluster
Z-score of cell type marker gene module expression per cluster. Strong diagonal pattern confirms annotation quality. High scores (red) indicate marker enrichment; low scores (blue) indicate depletion. Prolif clusters show strong proliferation signatures alongside their lineage identity.
Blvrb as FTM DiscriminatorNovel
Ferritin-transporting microglia (FTM) cannot be reliably identified by Fth1/Ftl1 expression alone, as 99.6% of all cells express Fth1. Instead, Blvrb (biliverdin reductase B) serves as the key discriminator, expressed in approximately 32% of cells with strong enrichment in the FTM cluster. This practical annotation guidance has not been previously documented.
Homeostatic Microglia HeterogeneityNovel
Six distinct homeostatic sub-clusters (HM_1–HM_6) were resolved, compared to 1–3 typically reported in published scRNA-seq studies. HM_1 dominates in WT controls (48.9%) while HM_2 expands in ATG7-deficient conditions (32.0%), suggesting ATG7 loss shifts the homeostatic equilibrium towards an alternative transcriptional state.
Microglia Trajectory & Pseudotime
58,135
Microglia Analyzed
subsetted for trajectory
0.47
5xFAD Effect (rbc)
pseudotime rank-biserial
0.22
ATG7 Effect (rbc)
pseudotime rank-biserial
p = 0.17
DAM ATG7 Effect
not significant
PAGA graph abstraction and Palantir diffusion pseudotime computed on 58,135 microglia reveal a hub-like topology rather than a simple linear chain. Pseudotime ordering proceeds from HM (0.002) through DAM (0.012) and IFN (0.023) to TM (0.093), FTM (0.159), and Prolif (0.228). The 5xFAD amyloid pathology shifts microglia pseudotime upward (rbc = 0.47), indicating a larger proportion of cells in activated states. ATG7 deficiency has a smaller but significant effect (rbc = 0.22). Critically, within DAM cells, ATG7 status does not alter pseudotime (p = 0.17), suggesting ATG7 affects entry rates into DAM rather than the DAM transcriptional program itself.
PAGA Graph — Microglia Cluster Connectivity
PAGA abstracted graph of microglia subtypes. Node size reflects cell count; edge thickness reflects PAGA connectivity weight. The strongest connections are TM↔Prolif (0.41), IFN↔Prolif (0.37), and DAM↔IFN (0.35). FTM connects most strongly to TM (0.27), not to HM or DAM, suggesting FTM derives from the transitional state.
Median Pseudotime by Microglia Subtype
Palantir diffusion pseudotime ordering of microglia subtypes. HM cells occupy the earliest pseudotime, followed by a rapid transition to DAM and IFN. FTM and Prolif occupy the latest pseudotime positions, consistent with terminal differentiation states.
FTM Derives from Transitional MicrogliaNovel
Ferritin-transporting microglia (FTM) connect most strongly to transitional microglia (TM) via PAGA (w = 0.27), not to HM (0.03) or DAM (0.03). This suggests iron accumulation occurs specifically in microglia that have already entered a transitional/inflammatory state, rather than branching directly from homeostatic or disease-associated populations.
ATG7 as Gatekeeper, Not ReprogrammerNovel
ATG7 deficiency increases the proportion of activated microglia (rbc = 0.22) but does not alter pseudotime within DAM cells (p = 0.17). This dissociates the effect on cell state entry rates from within-state transcriptional changes, suggesting ATG7 acts as a gatekeeper controlling the probability of transitioning to DAM rather than modifying what DAM cells express.
Gene Expression Dynamics Along Pseudotime
889
Significant Genes
FDR < 0.05
6,546
Genes Tested
interaction model
9
Ribosomal Proteins
in top 30 interaction genes
3
ER Chaperones
in top 30 interaction genes
A genome-wide interaction model (expression ~ pseudotime × ATG7 status) identified 889 genes with significantly altered pseudotime dynamics in ATG7-deficient microglia (FDR < 0.05, from 6,546 tested). The top interaction genes are dominated by ribosomal proteins (9 of top 30) with negative interaction coefficients, indicating impaired translation machinery scaling during activation. ER chaperones (Hsp90b1, Sdf2l1, Manf) in the top 30 show positive interaction coefficients, reflecting compensatory upregulation in KO microglia along the activation trajectory. Two additional ER chaperones (Dnajb11, Ppib) rank just outside the top 30 with similar positive coefficients.
Top 30 ATG7 × Pseudotime Interaction Genes
Top 30 genes ranked by F-statistic from the ATG7 × pseudotime interaction model. Red bars indicate genes with increased expression along pseudotime in KO relative to WT (positive interaction coefficient); blue bars indicate decreased expression in KO. ER chaperones (Hsp90b1, Manf, Sdf2l1) show positive interaction, while ribosomal proteins and MHC-II genes show negative interaction.
UPR genes show negative correlation with pseudotime in WT (Calr r = −0.16, Hspa5 r = −0.18) but near-zero in KO (r ≈ −0.02 to −0.05), indicating the UPR gradient is abolished. Solid lines = non-5xFAD; dashed = 5xFAD.
DAM signature genes (Trem2, Apoe) and iron-related genes (Fth1, Blvrb) show distinct pseudotime dynamics across genotypes. Blvrb (interaction coef = −1.79) marks FTM identity with altered trajectory dynamics in KO, while Trem2 and Apoe define DAM activation along pseudotime.
UPR Gradient Abolished in ATG7-KONovel
WT microglia dynamically modulate UPR gene expression along the activation trajectory (Calr r = −0.16, Hspa5 r = −0.18), progressively reducing ER stress response as they transition toward activated states. In ATG7-KO microglia, this gradient is completely flattened (r ≈ 0), suggesting autophagy is required for dynamic UPR remodeling during microglial state transitions — not just for maintaining UPR levels.
Impaired Translation Scaling & Compensatory ER Chaperones
Ribosomal proteins (9 in top 30) show systematically negative interaction coefficients, indicating KO microglia fail to upregulate translation machinery during activation. Conversely, ER chaperones (Hsp90b1 F = 230.0, Sdf2l1 F = 127.7, Manf F = 120.9) are compensatorily upregulated, suggesting an alternative protein quality control pathway engages when canonical autophagy-mediated proteostasis fails.
Differential Abundance Analysis
6,505
Neighborhoods
tested (Milo)
28.4%
Significant
1,845 at FDR < 0.1
−2.00
HM_1 Mean logFC
806 depleted in KO
+1.21
HM_2 Mean logFC
541 enriched in KO
Milo differential abundance testing on 6,505 neighborhoods (90,475 cells) with a GLM design of ~ disease_model + atg7_status. Positive logFC indicates enrichment in ATG7-KO; negative indicates depletion. The most striking finding is a homeostatic microglia bifurcation: HM_1 is strongly depleted (logFC −2.00) while HM_2 is enriched (+1.21), revealing a qualitative shift in homeostatic sub-states rather than simple depletion. DAM expansion (logFC +1.30), neutrophil depletion (logFC −1.00), and T cell enrichment (logFC +0.44) further define the ATG7-dependent immune landscape. Concordance with cluster proportions: Spearman ρ = 0.912.
Milo Differential Abundance by Cell Type
Mean neighborhood logFC per cell type from Milo (design: ~ disease_model + atg7_status). Green bars = enriched in ATG7-KO, red bars = depleted. HM_1 and HM_2 show the strongest and most divergent effects, highlighting the homeostatic microglia bifurcation. Neutrophil populations (Neutrophil_1/2/3) are consistently depleted despite ATG7 being knocked out only in microglia, suggesting indirect effects on myeloid cell recruitment.
Homeostatic Microglia BifurcationNovel
ATG7 loss does not simply deplete homeostatic microglia — it specifically shifts the compartment from HM_1 (logFC −2.00, 806 depleted) to HM_2 (logFC +1.21, 541 enriched). This qualitative rather than quantitative change suggests autophagy maintains a specific homeostatic transcriptional program; its loss shifts microglia to an alternative sub-state that may represent a “primed” or pre-activated configuration.
Neutrophil DepletionNovel
Neutrophils are significantly depleted in ATG7-KO brains (60 neighborhoods, mean logFC −1.00) after controlling for 5xFAD status. Since ATG7 is knocked out only in microglia (CX3CR1-Cre), this indirect effect suggests autophagy-deficient microglia alter the chemokine milieu, reducing neutrophil recruitment or retention — a non-cell-autonomous consequence not examined by the authors.
Differential Gene Expression
7
Comparisons
scRNA-seq pseudobulk DE
41
HM DEGs
ATG7 effect, all conditions
2.4×
Disease Amplification
146 vs 60 DEGs in KO vs WT
167
Bulk DEGs
20mo microglia (109↑ 58↓)
+5.85
Esr1 log₂FC
bulk 20mo (padj < 10⁻²⁸⁷)
+3.84
Cdkn2a log₂FC
p16, 20mo only (padj = 0.046)
Pseudobulk differential expression with PyDESeq2 across 7 comparisons identifies 41 DEGs in homeostatic microglia (C1: ATG7 effect, all conditions), with UPR genes Calr (log₂FC = −1.27) and Hspa5 (−1.12) confirmed downregulated. The most significant gene is Esr1 (estrogen receptorα), upregulated ~32-fold in KO microglia (log₂FC = 5.0, padj = 2.9 × 10⁻¹⁰⁷). The 5xFAD disease response is amplified 2.4× in KO background (146 vs 60 DEGs) with only 15 shared genes, indicating qualitatively altered disease response. Bulk RNA-seq at 20 months confirms 167 DEGs (109 up, 58 down) with Esr1 even more dramatic (log₂FC = 5.85) and senescence marker Cdkn2a (p16) now significant alongside persistent Cdkn1a (p21).
Pseudobulk DEGs by Comparison
DEG counts per comparison (PyDESeq2, FDR < 0.05, |log₂FC| > 1). C5 (5xFAD in KO HM) yields 146 DEGs — 2.4× more than C4 (5xFAD in WT HM, 60 DEGs) — demonstrating amplified disease response in ATG7-deficient background. C7 (ATG7 in FTM) shows only 10 DEGs, confirming FTM is largely ATG7-independent.
Bulk RNA-seq Volcano (20 Months)
167 significant DEGs from bulk RNA-seq of 20-month FACS-sorted microglia (2 WT vs 3 KO, wt3 excluded). −log₁₀(padj) capped at 50 for readability; Esr1 true value = 287. Dashed lines mark significance thresholds.
Bulk DEGs — 167 Significant Genes
| Gene | log₂FC | padj ▲ | baseMean | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esr1 | +5.85 | 8.9e-288 | 4930.4 | ↑ KO |
| Pla2g7 | +4.29 | 1.5e-124 | 2226.2 | ↑ KO |
| Ddost | -2.42 | 7.0e-43 | 3454.4 | ↓ KO |
| Wfdc17 | +4.47 | 2.2e-19 | 298.2 | ↑ KO |
| Saraf | -1.80 | 3.1e-17 | 6243.4 | ↓ KO |
| Lyl1 | -1.93 | 3.6e-16 | 848.4 | ↓ KO |
| Fscn1 | -1.31 | 2.8e-15 | 3387.3 | ↓ KO |
| Serp1 | -1.52 | 4.1e-13 | 1533.5 | ↓ KO |
| Mfsd1 | -1.36 | 8.6e-13 | 1872.3 | ↓ KO |
| Tm2d1 | -2.47 | 7.4e-12 | 365.2 | ↓ KO |
| Mrc1 | +2.64 | 6.5e-11 | 757.5 | ↑ KO |
| Cx3cr1 | -1.09 | 6.5e-11 | 143248.6 | ↓ KO |
| Ncln | -1.45 | 1.8e-10 | 1780.5 | ↓ KO |
| Fkbp1a | -1.57 | 2.0e-10 | 842.7 | ↓ KO |
| Slc39a4 | +1.50 | 2.7e-10 | 1284.2 | ↑ KO |
| Anxa2 | +2.58 | 3.1e-10 | 292.9 | ↑ KO |
| Slc2a8 | -2.21 | 3.1e-10 | 457.4 | ↓ KO |
| A530064D06Rik | +2.97 | 7.6e-10 | 277.3 | ↑ KO |
| Osgin1 | +1.69 | 2.7e-9 | 680.3 | ↑ KO |
| Atg7 | -1.36 | 2.8e-9 | 854.7 | ↓ KO |
| Hoxc8 | +7.93 | 3.2e-9 | 79.9 | ↑ KO |
| Ccnd2 | +3.40 | 4.8e-8 | 132.4 | ↑ KO |
| Tm9sf2 | -1.03 | 5.7e-8 | 2758.9 | ↓ KO |
| Ifnar2 | -1.14 | 5.7e-8 | 1790.5 | ↓ KO |
| Cox5a | -2.18 | 1.2e-7 | 223.0 | ↓ KO |
| Acaa1a | -2.07 | 1.2e-7 | 737.3 | ↓ KO |
| Sdf2l1 | -1.48 | 1.4e-7 | 2506.6 | ↓ KO |
| Ms4a7 | +2.59 | 4.0e-7 | 421.0 | ↑ KO |
| Acss1 | -1.29 | 4.1e-7 | 991.9 | ↓ KO |
| Vcam1 | +1.29 | 4.1e-7 | 2186.2 | ↑ KO |
| Blvrb | +1.16 | 5.2e-7 | 2290.4 | ↑ KO |
| Fez2 | -1.19 | 5.2e-7 | 1676.6 | ↓ KO |
| C4b | +2.12 | 5.4e-7 | 780.1 | ↑ KO |
| Capn11 | +5.60 | 7.2e-7 | 89.6 | ↑ KO |
| Cyc1 | -1.88 | 9.3e-7 | 653.5 | ↓ KO |
| Gdf3 | +4.73 | 1.9e-6 | 61.0 | ↑ KO |
| Lyz1 | +2.34 | 2.5e-6 | 155.2 | ↑ KO |
| Tmem154 | +1.35 | 3.4e-6 | 678.9 | ↑ KO |
| Gpr165 | -1.31 | 4.0e-6 | 928.2 | ↓ KO |
| Clec12a | +4.37 | 6.0e-6 | 91.1 | ↑ KO |
| Trpv4 | +1.23 | 1.3e-5 | 572.1 | ↑ KO |
| Ryr2 | +4.96 | 1.4e-5 | 74.9 | ↑ KO |
| Pigx | -1.57 | 1.4e-5 | 518.1 | ↓ KO |
| Xdh | +2.28 | 1.9e-5 | 208.0 | ↑ KO |
| Dab2 | +1.37 | 2.1e-5 | 1176.3 | ↑ KO |
| Sell | +6.09 | 4.5e-5 | 43.5 | ↑ KO |
| Gmpr | -1.10 | 5.0e-5 | 948.7 | ↓ KO |
| Tmem205 | +1.28 | 5.1e-5 | 434.5 | ↑ KO |
| Uck1 | -1.58 | 5.1e-5 | 328.1 | ↓ KO |
| Mgl2 | +3.04 | 5.3e-5 | 172.0 | ↑ KO |
| Cog8 | -1.85 | 7.9e-5 | 227.1 | ↓ KO |
| Ccl7 | +3.12 | 0.0001 | 118.1 | ↑ KO |
| Cd209f | +5.38 | 0.0001 | 40.6 | ↑ KO |
| Mgst1 | +2.99 | 0.0001 | 164.5 | ↑ KO |
| Trp53i13 | -2.54 | 0.0001 | 135.8 | ↓ KO |
| Cfp | +2.45 | 0.0002 | 131.8 | ↑ KO |
| Aoah | +2.41 | 0.0002 | 212.8 | ↑ KO |
| Gimap1 | -2.09 | 0.0002 | 220.7 | ↓ KO |
| Ddo | +6.61 | 0.0002 | 30.9 | ↑ KO |
| Fam53a | -1.44 | 0.0002 | 373.3 | ↓ KO |
| Cdkn1a | +1.42 | 0.0002 | 728.6 | ↑ KO |
| Crlf2 | -2.04 | 0.0002 | 285.1 | ↓ KO |
| Gstm1 | +1.26 | 0.0003 | 729.6 | ↑ KO |
| Dnase1l3 | +1.38 | 0.0004 | 446.2 | ↑ KO |
| Cp | +1.24 | 0.0005 | 382.9 | ↑ KO |
| Spsb1 | -1.07 | 0.0005 | 1131.6 | ↓ KO |
| Cd93 | +3.10 | 0.0006 | 83.0 | ↑ KO |
| Srd5a3 | -1.10 | 0.0006 | 611.4 | ↓ KO |
| Pf4 | +2.46 | 0.0006 | 148.9 | ↑ KO |
| Psme3 | -1.37 | 0.0007 | 604.2 | ↓ KO |
| Cd244a | +1.48 | 0.0008 | 247.3 | ↑ KO |
| Zfhx4 | +5.52 | 0.0008 | 55.6 | ↑ KO |
| Clec10a | +3.80 | 0.0009 | 60.0 | ↑ KO |
| Pdgfrb | +5.23 | 0.0009 | 24.6 | ↑ KO |
| Nrbf2 | -1.48 | 0.0012 | 243.4 | ↓ KO |
| Ltbp1 | +12.28 | 0.0012 | 26077.0 | ↑ KO |
| Pirb | +1.01 | 0.0013 | 1325.4 | ↑ KO |
| Ifitm2 | +2.24 | 0.0014 | 127.9 | ↑ KO |
| Kirrel2 | +5.88 | 0.0014 | 50.5 | ↑ KO |
| Gnaz | +4.82 | 0.0022 | 35.3 | ↑ KO |
| Gramd1b | +1.09 | 0.0022 | 507.4 | ↑ KO |
| Ripor2 | +1.27 | 0.0022 | 420.4 | ↑ KO |
| Psmd3 | -1.31 | 0.0022 | 506.8 | ↓ KO |
| Pmaip1 | +2.22 | 0.0022 | 160.4 | ↑ KO |
| Ccl8 | +2.56 | 0.0025 | 138.8 | ↑ KO |
| Tusc3 | -1.51 | 0.0027 | 230.4 | ↓ KO |
| Iigp1 | +2.07 | 0.0029 | 140.0 | ↑ KO |
| Pop5 | -1.85 | 0.0031 | 130.4 | ↓ KO |
| Zdbf2 | +4.54 | 0.0031 | 35.6 | ↑ KO |
| Vwa3b | +10.43 | 0.0034 | 2696.3 | ↑ KO |
| H2-Eb1 | +3.45 | 0.0035 | 2042.6 | ↑ KO |
| Creld2 | -1.10 | 0.0042 | 566.2 | ↓ KO |
| Colec12 | +7.13 | 0.0044 | 23.0 | ↑ KO |
| Meis3 | -1.42 | 0.0050 | 253.2 | ↓ KO |
| Msr1 | +1.57 | 0.0052 | 180.2 | ↑ KO |
| Stap1 | +5.22 | 0.0052 | 24.6 | ↑ KO |
| Klhdc8b | -1.05 | 0.0055 | 434.9 | ↓ KO |
| Klra2 | +3.40 | 0.0058 | 40.6 | ↑ KO |
| Shroom4 | +6.19 | 0.0066 | 25.6 | ↑ KO |
| Cpq | +1.00 | 0.0068 | 800.1 | ↑ KO |
| Il18bp | +1.45 | 0.0069 | 280.4 | ↑ KO |
| Gbp2 | +1.16 | 0.0069 | 316.7 | ↑ KO |
| Dda1 | -1.24 | 0.0069 | 312.8 | ↓ KO |
| Pygl | +1.58 | 0.0074 | 328.5 | ↑ KO |
| Vmn1r43 | +4.66 | 0.0081 | 40.2 | ↑ KO |
| Gpatch11 | +1.10 | 0.0083 | 323.4 | ↑ KO |
| Cxcl2 | +3.41 | 0.0093 | 32.4 | ↑ KO |
| Pdia5 | -1.22 | 0.0095 | 333.8 | ↓ KO |
| Gas7 | +1.95 | 0.0101 | 219.9 | ↑ KO |
| Gm29666 | +2.58 | 0.0116 | 129.4 | ↑ KO |
| Mfsd14a | -1.03 | 0.0116 | 348.5 | ↓ KO |
| Nedd4 | +4.45 | 0.0116 | 26.1 | ↑ KO |
| Tssk5 | +5.73 | 0.0125 | 28.0 | ↑ KO |
| Pcdh15 | +4.64 | 0.0125 | 43.9 | ↑ KO |
| H2ax | -2.42 | 0.0132 | 67.0 | ↓ KO |
| Flot2 | -1.11 | 0.0140 | 356.9 | ↓ KO |
| Plppr4 | -3.04 | 0.0141 | 38.5 | ↓ KO |
| Fbxl15 | -3.14 | 0.0151 | 40.4 | ↓ KO |
| Itgb2l | +4.23 | 0.0151 | 44.5 | ↑ KO |
| Dpysl4 | +9.55 | 0.0151 | 245.5 | ↑ KO |
| Tbx19 | +7.11 | 0.0165 | 886.2 | ↑ KO |
| Slpi | +3.02 | 0.0175 | 41.8 | ↑ KO |
| Akr7a5 | -1.97 | 0.0179 | 108.6 | ↓ KO |
| Wt1 | +5.35 | 0.0180 | 28.9 | ↑ KO |
| Clec4n | +3.62 | 0.0180 | 50.0 | ↑ KO |
| Tsen54 | -1.56 | 0.0183 | 174.6 | ↓ KO |
| Ezr | +1.57 | 0.0183 | 171.2 | ↑ KO |
| Pdia3 | -1.51 | 0.0191 | 21390.8 | ↓ KO |
| Ehd1 | +1.64 | 0.0194 | 119.3 | ↑ KO |
| Sh3bgrl | +1.38 | 0.0202 | 433.1 | ↑ KO |
| P2ry14 | +2.72 | 0.0226 | 71.0 | ↑ KO |
| Ccdc151 | +4.69 | 0.0227 | 36.6 | ↑ KO |
| Dram1 | +3.40 | 0.0251 | 33.2 | ↑ KO |
| Acp5 | +4.33 | 0.0251 | 46.0 | ↑ KO |
| Kti12 | -1.54 | 0.0252 | 128.5 | ↓ KO |
| Rap1gap | +4.00 | 0.0269 | 34.9 | ↑ KO |
| Ebpl | -1.31 | 0.0276 | 247.1 | ↓ KO |
| Tmem70 | -1.28 | 0.0282 | 215.0 | ↓ KO |
| Foxp2 | +4.96 | 0.0286 | 27.5 | ↑ KO |
| Nrg4 | +7.99 | 0.0289 | 580.5 | ↑ KO |
| Serpinb6a | +1.66 | 0.0290 | 203.8 | ↑ KO |
| Rxrg | +1.12 | 0.0290 | 538.3 | ↑ KO |
| Col26a1 | +4.51 | 0.0291 | 32.1 | ↑ KO |
| Hacd2 | -1.03 | 0.0291 | 579.4 | ↓ KO |
| Adamts5 | +9.65 | 0.0299 | 5802.4 | ↑ KO |
| Zpr1 | -1.24 | 0.0299 | 248.2 | ↓ KO |
| Tfap2a | +7.33 | 0.0330 | 132.7 | ↑ KO |
| Skap1 | +5.89 | 0.0330 | 20.9 | ↑ KO |
| Unc45b | +6.80 | 0.0335 | 19.5 | ↑ KO |
| Tbc1d10a | -1.35 | 0.0347 | 282.8 | ↓ KO |
| Syne1 | +2.45 | 0.0347 | 48.0 | ↑ KO |
| Pla2g2d | +3.11 | 0.0371 | 45.6 | ↑ KO |
| Spg21 | -1.02 | 0.0380 | 343.1 | ↓ KO |
| Ddhd1 | +1.60 | 0.0391 | 190.6 | ↑ KO |
| H2-Aa | +2.88 | 0.0391 | 2862.9 | ↑ KO |
| Plbd1 | +2.50 | 0.0414 | 123.2 | ↑ KO |
| Cd44 | +1.25 | 0.0421 | 268.2 | ↑ KO |
| Krt20 | +8.44 | 0.0428 | 340.7 | ↑ KO |
| Fcna | +3.17 | 0.0429 | 30.8 | ↑ KO |
| Ifi207 | +1.44 | 0.0451 | 184.9 | ↑ KO |
| Samd9l | +1.37 | 0.0457 | 150.1 | ↑ KO |
| Tnfaip2 | +1.03 | 0.0458 | 436.1 | ↑ KO |
| Cdkn2a | +3.84 | 0.0458 | 20.1 | ↑ KO |
| Zbed3 | -1.69 | 0.0468 | 107.1 | ↓ KO |
| Serpinb8 | +8.60 | 0.0485 | 24.1 | ↑ KO |
| Mto1 | -1.22 | 0.0490 | 195.6 | ↓ KO |
| Cdh3 | +5.10 | 0.0494 | 24.1 | ↑ KO |
Esr1: A Novel ATG7-Dependent GeneNovel
Estrogen receptor alpha is the single most significant gene in the entire analysis. At 5 months, Esr1 is upregulated ~32-fold in KO microglia (log₂FC = 5.0, padj = 2.9 × 10⁻¹⁰⁷), consistently across all 11 samples (12–27% expressing in KO vs 0.5–1% in WT). At 20 months, the effect amplifies further (log₂FC = 5.85, padj = 8.9 × 10⁻²⁸⁸). This finding was not reported in the original paper and may represent a compensatory neuroprotective mechanism, as estrogen receptor signaling promotes anti-inflammatory microglia phenotypes.
p21 → p16: Progressive SenescenceNovel
At 5 months, Cdkn1a (p21) is significantly upregulated (log₂FC = 1.62, padj = 4.4 × 10⁻¹⁴), indicating early senescence entry. By 20 months, Cdkn2a (p16INK4a) becomes significant (log₂FC = 3.84, padj = 0.046) alongside persistent Cdkn1a (log₂FC = 1.42). The emergence of p16 at 20 months establishes a temporal trajectory: early p21 activation followed by irreversible p16 accumulation, consistent with progressive cellular senescence in ATG7-deficient microglia.
Pathway Enrichment Analysis
1,348
Significant Pathways
scRNA-seq FDR < 0.25
−2.64
UPR NES (KEGG)
strongest scRNA signal
+1.94
Ferroptosis NES
DAM cells (KEGG)
141
Bulk Sig Pathways
20-month FDR < 0.25
GSEA preranked analysis across 7 pseudobulk comparisons × 3 pathway databases (KEGG, Hallmark, Reactome) identified 1,348 significantly enriched gene sets (FDR < 0.25) from 7,909 tests. Mouse–human ortholog mapping achieved 92% coverage via Ensembl BioMart. The heatmap below shows normalized enrichment scores (NES) for curated top pathways across all comparisons. UPR/ER stress pathways show the strongest and most consistent downregulation in ATG7-KO (NES −2.56 to −2.64), while ribosome/translation pathways are strongly upregulated in disease contexts (NES +2.70 to +2.89).
GSEA NES Heatmap — All Databases
Curated top pathways × 7 pseudobulk comparisons. C1–C3/C6–C7 are ATG7 KO vs WT effects in different cell types; C4–C5 are disease effects. Pathways sorted by mean NES (most negative at bottom). The block of blue in ATG7-KO comparisons highlights coordinated UPR/glycan downregulation; red clusters in disease comparisons show ribosome/translation upregulation.
Pathway Results Table287 entries
| Pathway | Database | Comparison | NES ↑ | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -2.638 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -2.591 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -2.558 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -2.360 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | -2.306 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -2.216 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | -2.206 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -2.201 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -2.173 | 0.0010 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -2.140 | 0.0010 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -2.113 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -2.088 | 0.0019 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | -2.064 | 0.0045 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | -2.057 | 0.0061 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | -2.043 | 0.0079 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -2.017 | 0.0070 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -2.009 | 0.0047 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.983 | 0.0049 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -1.949 | 0.0107 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | -1.947 | 0.0218 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -1.945 | 0.0021 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -1.938 | 0.0066 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | -1.937 | 0.0930 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | -1.936 | 0.0055 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | -1.919 | 0.0093 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | -1.917 | 0.0790 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | -1.906 | 0.0201 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -1.906 | 0.0070 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -1.899 | 0.0129 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.899 | 0.0216 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | -1.869 | 0.0204 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | -1.847 | 0.0231 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | -1.843 | 0.0063 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -1.823 | 0.0114 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.812 | 0.0371 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | -1.806 | 0.0435 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.805 | 0.0029 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.784 | 0.0363 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.779 | 0.0339 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | -1.777 | 0.0590 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -1.758 | 0.0413 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.717 | 0.0596 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.707 | 0.0757 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -1.705 | 0.0595 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -1.705 | 0.0546 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | -1.686 | 0.1673 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | -1.675 | 0.0143 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.672 | 0.0222 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -1.669 | 0.0754 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.642 | 0.1002 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -1.641 | 0.0748 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.641 | 0.0927 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.607 | 0.0184 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | -1.599 | 0.0855 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.579 | 0.1414 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.578 | 0.1311 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | -1.513 | 0.2073 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -1.510 | 0.1565 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.507 | 0.1697 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | -1.505 | 0.0400 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.497 | 0.1973 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.492 | 0.1970 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | -1.461 | 0.2225 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.447 | 0.1973 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | -1.441 | 0.2376 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.426 | 0.0667 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.406 | 0.0885 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.381 | 0.0990 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.378 | 0.0891 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.373 | 0.0848 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.358 | 0.1116 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -1.339 | 0.1198 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | -1.282 | 0.5024 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | -1.246 | 0.3710 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | -1.226 | 0.1648 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.217 | 0.1728 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | -1.201 | 0.1821 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | -1.181 | 0.3155 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | -1.140 | 0.5863 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | -1.084 | 0.4562 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | -1.077 | 0.6007 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | -1.064 | 0.8825 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -0.994 | 0.5669 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | -0.945 | 0.7172 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | -0.926 | 0.6834 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | -0.858 | 0.8669 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | -0.855 | 1.0000 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | -0.819 | 0.8535 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | -0.670 | 0.9660 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +0.626 | 1.0000 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +0.745 | 0.9562 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +0.804 | 0.9985 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +0.822 | 0.8967 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +0.828 | 0.8314 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +0.829 | 0.9688 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +0.859 | 0.8194 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +0.867 | 0.9291 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +0.958 | 0.9921 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | +1.005 | 0.5675 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.024 | 0.4289 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.025 | 0.4424 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.065 | 0.4468 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.065 | 0.8203 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +1.095 | 0.6400 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.120 | 0.4840 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.147 | 0.6890 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | +1.165 | 0.5582 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +1.170 | 0.5914 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.242 | 0.5851 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.246 | 0.2367 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.252 | 0.5751 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.268 | 0.5672 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.269 | 0.2109 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +1.274 | 0.4665 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.275 | 0.2306 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.290 | 0.5440 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.317 | 0.1759 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.320 | 0.0863 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.328 | 0.1696 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.334 | 0.2019 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +1.336 | 0.3534 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.338 | 0.2133 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.338 | 0.1662 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.364 | 0.1420 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.367 | 0.2024 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.371 | 0.5036 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.381 | 0.1855 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.382 | 0.4967 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | +1.382 | 0.1704 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.383 | 0.1283 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +1.390 | 0.2801 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.402 | 0.5003 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.402 | 0.1724 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +1.422 | 0.0835 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +1.430 | 0.4742 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.440 | 0.1447 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +1.441 | 0.0902 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.459 | 0.1639 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.476 | 0.0992 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.480 | 0.1346 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.488 | 0.0632 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.489 | 0.2014 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.489 | 0.1064 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.503 | 0.0584 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.506 | 0.1819 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +1.511 | 0.0728 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +1.517 | 0.2435 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.520 | 0.0950 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.520 | 0.0547 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.520 | 0.0167 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.522 | 0.0171 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.528 | 0.1133 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.535 | 0.0833 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.552 | 0.1315 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.552 | 0.1822 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | +1.553 | 0.0836 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | +1.557 | 0.0930 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | +1.557 | 0.2795 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +1.562 | 0.0700 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.564 | 0.0117 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.566 | 0.2439 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +1.572 | 0.1157 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.583 | 0.1357 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.605 | 0.2423 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.614 | 0.2358 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +1.620 | 0.1602 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.621 | 0.0480 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | +1.627 | 0.1561 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +1.633 | 0.1523 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +1.633 | 0.0685 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.636 | 0.2463 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +1.640 | 0.0789 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.652 | 0.2463 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.658 | 0.3164 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +1.664 | 0.1386 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +1.672 | 0.1349 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.673 | 0.2387 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.676 | 0.0040 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.686 | 0.2373 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.686 | 0.2289 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.692 | 0.1600 | |
| Hallmark | C7: FTM all | +1.692 | 0.0818 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | +1.694 | 0.1315 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.699 | 0.3100 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | +1.702 | 0.3203 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.714 | 0.0027 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.726 | 0.2407 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.728 | 0.0025 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +1.734 | 0.1718 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.734 | 0.2408 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.742 | 0.2447 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +1.746 | 0.2012 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +1.752 | 0.1608 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +1.756 | 0.0181 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.757 | 0.0094 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | +1.762 | 0.1987 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | +1.772 | 0.1054 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.795 | 0.2748 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | +1.817 | 0.0841 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.842 | 0.2550 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.850 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +1.853 | 0.0376 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +1.864 | 0.1573 | |
| KEGG | C7: FTM all | +1.867 | 0.2211 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +1.871 | 0.0028 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | +1.872 | 0.0930 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.898 | 0.1528 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.899 | 0.2272 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +1.901 | 0.1494 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +1.908 | 0.1495 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +1.919 | 0.0230 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.927 | 0.2077 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.945 | 0.2052 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +1.949 | 0.1493 | |
| Reactome | C7: FTM all | +1.972 | 0.2766 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.973 | 0.2229 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.975 | 0.2332 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.977 | 0.2429 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +1.980 | 0.1411 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +1.980 | 0.2532 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +1.981 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.016 | 0.1175 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | +2.021 | 0.0044 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | +2.023 | 0.2271 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +2.026 | 0.1297 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +2.045 | 0.1731 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.057 | 0.0172 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | +2.059 | 0.0033 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.070 | 0.2439 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.071 | 0.0135 | |
| Hallmark | C6: DAM all | +2.073 | 0.0066 | |
| Reactome | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.075 | 0.2936 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +2.093 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.120 | 0.1413 | |
| Hallmark | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.148 | 0.0192 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.154 | 0.0725 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.155 | 0.1446 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +2.158 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.164 | 0.1499 | |
| Hallmark | C1: HM all | +2.169 | 0.1565 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.173 | 0.1638 | |
| KEGG | C3: DAM 5xF | +2.177 | 0.1680 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +2.199 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.203 | 0.1844 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.205 | 0.1973 | |
| Hallmark | C5: Dis. KO | +2.205 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.250 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.292 | <0.001 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +2.331 | <0.001 | |
| Hallmark | C4: Dis. WT | +2.338 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.346 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.372 | <0.001 | |
| Hallmark | C2: HM 5xF | +2.373 | 0.0653 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +2.443 | 0.0807 | |
| Reactome | C1: HM all | +2.487 | 0.0665 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.508 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C1: HM all | +2.531 | 0.0075 | |
| KEGG | C2: HM 5xF | +2.543 | 0.0209 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.546 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.552 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.558 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.581 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.598 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.639 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C6: DAM all | +2.640 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.651 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.653 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C2: HM 5xF | +2.654 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.666 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.668 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.673 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.675 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.677 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.682 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C6: DAM all | +2.694 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C4: Dis. WT | +2.699 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.709 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C4: Dis. WT | +2.714 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.783 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.842 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.868 | <0.001 | |
| KEGG | C5: Dis. KO | +2.889 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.889 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.890 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.911 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.928 | <0.001 | |
| Reactome | C5: Dis. KO | +2.928 | <0.001 |
Bulk RNA-seq GSEA — 20-Month Microglia
GSEA of 20-month FACS-sorted microglia (ATG7-KO vs WT, 5 samples) identified 141 significantly enriched pathways (FDR < 0.25) across KEGG (30), Hallmark (17), and Reactome (94). The top 20 pathways by absolute NES reveal the same UPR/ER stress downregulation (blue) and ribosome/translation upregulation (red) observed in 5-month scRNA-seq, with the IRE1α–XBP1 arm now specifically implicated. Prefix: [K] KEGG, [H] Hallmark, [R] Reactome.
Top 20 pathways from bulk RNA-seq GSEA ranked by absolute NES. UPR-related pathways (IRE1α, XBP1, ATF6, N-glycan) are consistently downregulated while ribosome/translation pathways dominate the upregulated set — an age-dependent compensatory translation response absent from 5-month scRNA-seq.
UPR/ER Stress — Strongest Signal
The UPR is the most consistently downregulated pathway across both platforms and ages: scRNA NES −2.64 (KEGG, 5 mo) and bulk NES −2.44 (KEGG, 20 mo). In aged microglia, the IRE1α–XBP1 arm is specifically implicated (NES −2.54), with ATF6 branches also significantly depleted. Co-downregulation of N-glycan biosynthesis and antigen processing reflects broader ER functional impairment beyond the UPR itself.
Ferroptosis in DAM Novel
Ferroptosis is enriched in ATG7-KO DAM cells (scRNA NES +1.94, KEGG) with co-enrichment of glutathione metabolism and iron transport. Bulk 20-month data shows ferroptosis trending positive (NES +1.45) alongside strong mineral absorption (NES +2.04), suggesting age-dependent ferroptotic vulnerability. This connects autophagy deficiency → impaired iron recycling → ferroptotic cell death in disease-associated microglia.
Cholesterol Homeostasis Novel
Cholesterol homeostasis is specifically downregulated in ATG7-KO DAM (Hallmark NES −2.11, FDR ≈ 0) but not in homeostatic microglia. This likely reflects disruption of the Trem2–APOE lipid metabolism axis central to DAM function. Combined with the finding that Apoe→Lrp1 signaling is lost in KO, the lipid supply chain from homeostatic to disease-associated microglia appears severed by autophagy deficiency.
ATG7 × Disease Interaction
0
Significant Genes
FDR < 0.1 in any cell type
14,169
Genes Tested (HM)
11,748 DAM · 11,181 FTM
0.126
Min Adjusted p
Htra3 in HM (log2FC +1.63)
290
Pathway Interactions
FDR < 0.25 (of 4,127 tested)
Gene-Level Interaction Results by Cell Type
| Cell Type | Genes Tested | Sig (FDR<0.05) | Nominal p<0.01 | Nominal p<0.05 | Min padj | ATG7 Main (FDR<0.05) | Disease Main (FDR<0.05) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HM | 14,169 | 0 | 105 | 608 | 0.126 | 122 | 179 |
| DAM | 11,748 | 0 | 55 | 390 | >0.99 | 170 | 204 |
| FTM | 11,181 | 0 | 30 | 223 | >0.99 | 5 | 2 |
Despite strong main effects for both ATG7 (122 HM genes, 170 DAM genes at FDR < 0.05) and disease (179 HM, 204 DAM), the interaction term yields zero significant genes. The HM nominal hits (105 at p < 0.01) roughly match the expected false-positive count (~142 out of 14,169), consistent with the null hypothesis.
Top Pathway-Level Interactions (GSEA on Interaction-Ranked Genes)
GSEA on interaction-ranked genes reveals 290 significant pathways (FDR < 0.25) across 4,127 tested. Translation and ribosome biogenesis pathways show the strongest sub-additive (negative NES) interactions in both HM and DAM, indicating that the combined ATG7-KO + 5xFAD condition saturates the translational compensation response.
Additive Biology ModelNovel
The original paper framed ATG7-KO + 5xFAD as a synergistic “second hit” model. Our formal interaction analysis reveals the enhanced disease phenotype arises from additive contributions of two independent effects, not qualitatively new transcriptional programs. The 2.4× DEG amplification in KO background (146 vs 60 genes) reflects combined magnitude, not synergy. With only 11 samples (7 residual df), a ≥20-sample study would be needed to detect subtle interactions (power ∼3× higher).
Translational SaturationNovel
While gene-level effects are additive, GSEA reveals a consistent sub-additive interaction for translation/ribosome pathways (NES = −2.69 to −3.13 in HM and DAM). Both ATG7-KO and 5xFAD independently upregulate translation, but the combined condition cannot double the response — cells hit a translational capacity ceiling. This saturated compensation may indicate worse outcomes: autophagy-deficient microglia in AD cannot mount the full compensatory translation response that either insult alone would trigger.
Gene Signature Scoring
−0.73
UPR Effect in DAM
Rank-biserial correlation (ATG7 KO vs WT)
0.586
Ferroptosis Score
KO-5xFAD DAM mean (vs 0.540 WT)
−0.130
Ferroptosis–UPR r
Spearman anti-correlation in DAM
52 / 72
Significant Tests
Mann-Whitney U (FDR < 0.05)
Single-cell gene signature scoring for Ferroptosis (18 genes), Senescence (16 genes), and UPR (18 genes) across 90,475 cells and 6 microglia subtypes. UPR impairment is the dominant ATG7-dependent signature across all microglia subtypes (rank-biserial = −0.58 to −0.73), providing single-cell validation of the pseudobulk DE and GSEA findings. Ferroptosis vulnerability is selectively elevated in KO DAM and critically is disease-conditional: 5xFAD increases DAM ferroptosis only in the ATG7-KO background (padj = 0.041) but not in WT (p = 0.19).
ATG7 Effect on Signature Scores (KO − WT)
Each cell shows the difference in mean score between KO and WT for a given signature, cell type, and disease context. UPR shows massive, uniform reduction across all cell types (deep blue), while Ferroptosis is modestly elevated (light red), particularly in DAM. Senescence shows minimal ATG7 effect.
Ferroptosis vs UPR Score Anti-Correlation
Each point represents one cell type × condition combination. KO conditions (amber, red) cluster in the lower-right: higher ferroptosis, lower UPR. WT conditions (green, blue) cluster upper-left. The anti-correlation (DAM r = −0.130, p < 10−30) is driven by KO conditions, revealing a mechanistically linked “double vulnerability” at the single-cell level.
Double Vulnerability: Ferroptosis–UPR Anti-CorrelationNovel
The negative correlation between Ferroptosis and UPR scores (DAM r = −0.130, HM r = −0.073, p < 10−30) reveals that these are not independent consequences of ATG7 loss but are mechanistically linked at the single-cell level. Cells with the lowest UPR activity tend to have the highest ferroptosis susceptibility. The proposed mechanism: impaired UPR → reduced ER proteostasis → disrupted iron handling → ferroptotic vulnerability. This “double vulnerability” integrates the two main ATG7-dependent pathological axes and suggests that pharmacological UPR induction (e.g., TUDCA) could rescue both defects simultaneously.
Disease-Conditional Ferroptosis in DAMNovel
5xFAD increases DAM ferroptosis only in the ATG7-KO background (padj = 0.041) and not in WT (p = 0.19). Autophagy normally protects activated microglia from ferroptosis during disease through NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy and glutathione recycling. When this protection is removed by ATG7 loss, amyloid-associated stress pushes DAM cells toward ferroptotic vulnerability. This has therapeutic implications: ferroptosis inhibitors (ferrostatin-1, liproxstatin-1) may specifically benefit autophagy-impaired microglia in AD.
Ferroptosis and Senescence Are Independent Programs
The near-zero correlation between Ferroptosis and Senescence scores (HM r = −0.008, DAM r = 0.014, both non-significant) demonstrates these are distinct pathological programs affecting different cell populations. Ferroptosis concentrates in DAM (highest scores), while senescence shows low-level, more uniform activation driven primarily by 5xFAD (HM padj = 2.9 × 10−16 for disease effect) rather than ATG7 status. This argues against a simple “cellular stress cascade” model and instead supports parallel, independent pathological pathways with distinct therapeutic targets.
Regulatory Networks
2,844
Significant TF–Cell Pairs
FDR < 0.05 out of 7,744 tests (36.7%)
−1.27
ATF6 Δ Activity in DAM
Strongest UPR TF reduction (padj ≈ 0)
9
DAM Pathways Down
Growth/survival signaling desert in KO DAM
56
Significant Pathway Tests
FDR < 0.05 out of 154 tests (36.4%)
Transcription Factor Activity Inference
ULM-based TF activity inference using mouse CollecTRI regulons (43,226 interactions, 1,165 TFs, 6,582 targets) across 90,475 cells reveals ATG7 loss causes a coordinated collapse of the UPR transcriptional program, with ATF6/ATF6B as the most severely affected TFs (diff = −1.27 in DAM, padj ≈ 0) — more affected than XBP1 or ATF4, pinpointing the ATF6 arm as the primary UPR branch compromised. Spi1/PU.1 (myeloid identity) is downregulated in 8 of 11 microglia subtypes, while MHC-II regulators (RFXAP diff = −0.68, RFXANK −0.60, RFX5 −0.55 in DAM) are strongly reduced. NRF2 shows compensatory upregulation in homeostatic microglia (HM_2 diff = +0.33) but fails in activated states. Strikingly, Esr1 TF activity is paradoxically reduced despite massive gene upregulation (log2FC = 5.0–5.85), revealing non-functional overexpression.
TF Activity Differences (KO − WT)
Top 28 TFs ranked by effect size in DAM. UPR TFs (Atf6, Atf6b, Xbp1) show the strongest and most consistent downregulation across all microglia subtypes. White dots (•) indicate significance at FDR < 0.05. Cell types ordered from homeostatic (HM_1–HM_6) through transitional (TM) to activated (DAM, FTM, IFN) and proliferating (Prolif). HM_1 shows the broadest upregulation of compensatory TFs (Lmo4, Mkx, Tgfb1i1), consistent with its Milo depletion pattern.
ATF6 Arm: Primary UPR Branch CompromisedNovel
ATF6 and ATF6B are the most severely affected UPR transcription factors in ATG7-deficient microglia (ATF6 diff = −1.27 in DAM, significant in all 10 microglia types tested), exceeding XBP1 (diff = −0.67) and ATF4 effects. Most autophagy–UPR crosstalk studies focus on the IRE1/XBP1 or PERK/ATF4 arms; the ATF6 arm being the primary branch compromised by autophagy loss in microglia is previously unreported. ATF6 controls ER protein folding capacity and ERAD — its collapse directly explains the downstream Calr and Hspa5 downregulation observed in differential expression analysis.
Esr1 Paradox: Non-Functional OverexpressionNovel
Despite massive Esr1 gene upregulation (log2FC = 5.0–5.85 across ages and platforms, 12–27% expressing in KO vs 0.5–1% in WT), Esr1 transcription factor activity is paradoxically reduced (diff = −0.15 to −0.37, significant in 3 cell types). The cells produce excess Esr1 mRNA as a failed compensatory attempt — the protein may lack necessary cofactors, ligand availability, or proper post-translational processing for functional estrogen receptor signaling. This “non-functional overexpression” pattern emerges as a recurring theme in ATG7-deficient microglia (also observed for JAK-STAT pathway components).
PROGENy Pathway Activity Inference
PROGENy uses experimentally-derived perturbation footprints (14 pathways, 6,398 mouse gene interactions, top 500 genes/pathway) rather than gene set membership, providing a functional view of signaling activity across 90,475 cells. DAM cells in ATG7-KO show a coordinated shutdown of 9 growth/survival pathways (PI3K diff = −0.35, JAK-STAT −0.29, TGFb −0.20, Hypoxia −0.20, VEGF −0.15, EGFR −0.15, WNT −0.15, NFκB −0.11, Androgen −0.08) with only p53 (+0.30) and TNFa (+0.10) upregulated — a “signaling desert” consistent with cells transitioning toward ferroptotic death rather than productive activation. Critically, JAK-STAT activity is DOWN in DAM (−0.29) despite GSEA showing JAK-STAT gene enrichment, revealing a gene-expression vs functional-signaling disconnect that parallels the Esr1 paradox.
PROGENy Pathway Activity Differences (KO − WT)
14 PROGENy pathways ranked by effect size in DAM. The DAM column shows a striking signaling desert pattern with 9 pathways significantly reduced (blue) and only p53 upregulated (red). HM_1 and HM_2 show distinct profiles explaining the Milo bifurcation: HM_1 is MAPK/PI3K-hyperactive while HM_2 is p53/NFκB-driven. HM_6 shows massive JAK-STAT activation (+1.14). White dots (•) indicate FDR < 0.05.
DAM Signaling DesertNovel
ATG7-deficient DAM cells show coordinated collapse of 9 growth/survival signaling pathways simultaneously, creating a catastrophic failure of the DAM signaling network rather than selective pathway impairment. PI3K (downstream of TREM2, diff = −0.35, padj ≈ 0) is the most severely affected, consistent with disrupted TREM2/APOE signaling and cholesterol homeostasis loss. Only p53 (+0.30) compensates, driving senescence rather than productive activation. This profile — simultaneous survival pathway loss with p53 gain — is consistent with cells transitioning toward ferroptotic death (confirmed in Gene Signatures analysis).
HM Bifurcation: Hyperactive vs SenescentNovel
The HM_1/HM_2 bifurcation identified by Milo now has distinct signaling profiles: HM_1 is hyperactive (MAPK +0.41, PI3K +0.17, JAK-STAT +0.16) while HM_2 is senescent (p53 +0.41, NFκB +0.21, JAK-STAT −0.29). HM_1 may be depleted through activation-induced burnout — excessive MAPK/PI3K signaling driving cells out of homeostasis — while HM_2 accumulates through p53-driven growth arrest. This provides a mechanistic explanation for why ATG7 loss produces opposite effects on two homeostatic microglia subtypes.
Cell-Cell Communication
2,641
Significant Interactions
In at least one condition (rank < 0.1)
243
Gained in KO
New or strengthened interactions
278
Lost in KO
Weakened or abolished interactions
2:1
DAM Loss Ratio
42 lost vs 21 gained — communication collapse
LIANA cell-cell communication analysis reveals that ATG7 loss fundamentally rewires intercellular communication in the brain immune microenvironment. Among 2,641 significant interactions, 278 are lost and 243 gained in KO. DAM cells show the most dramatic communication collapse, losing twice as many interactions as they gain (42 vs 21) — consistent with the "signaling desert" identified by PROGENy pathway analysis. Key lost signals include Adam10→Trem2 (critical for TREM2 cleavage) and Apoe→Lrp1 (lipid metabolism), while compensatory BAFF signaling (Tnfsf13b→Tnfrsf17) emerges as a novel microglia-to-microglia survival axis.
Net Interaction Changes by Cell Type Pair
Net interaction changes (gained − lost) per cell type pair in ATG7-KO vs WT. Green indicates net gain; red indicates net loss. TM as target shows the most consistent loss pattern, while IFN-originating signals tend to be gained.
Top Differential Ligand-Receptor Interactions
Top 30 gained (green, negative ΔRank) and top 30 lost (red, positive ΔRank) interactions in ATG7-KO vs WT. TM-originating signals dominate both gained interactions (via Adam10, Pdgfb, Vim) and lost interactions (via App→Cd74, S100a9→Itgb2).
Differential Interactions Table
| Ligand | Receptor | Source | Target | ΔRank | |ΔRank| ▼ | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vim | Cd44 | TM | B_cell | -0.947 | 0.947 | Gained |
| Gstp1 | Traf2 | Prolif | TM | -0.941 | 0.941 | Gained |
| Pdgfb | S1pr1 | TM | DAM | -0.923 | 0.923 | Gained |
| Tnfsf13b | Tnfrsf13b | HM_1 | TM | -0.920 | 0.920 | Gained |
| Fadd | Traf2 | Monocyte | TM | -0.917 | 0.917 | Gained |
| Adam10 | Notch2 | TM | Prolif | -0.906 | 0.906 | Gained |
| Mfng | Notch2 | TM | IFN | -0.887 | 0.887 | Gained |
| Cd200 | Cd200r1 | B_cell | TM | -0.835 | 0.835 | Gained |
| Cd200r1 | Cd200 | TM | B_cell | -0.835 | 0.835 | Gained |
| Hspa4 | Tlr4 | TM | BAM | -0.818 | 0.818 | Gained |
| Pdgfb | Itgav | TM | IFN | -0.778 | 0.778 | Gained |
| Pdgfb | Itgav | TM | HM_other | -0.749 | 0.749 | Gained |
| Sema4d | Cd72 | TM | T_cell | -0.703 | 0.703 | Gained |
| Adam10 | Notch2 | TM | IFN | -0.647 | 0.647 | Gained |
| Pdgfb | Itgav | TM | Monocyte | -0.645 | 0.645 | Gained |
| Adam10 | Tspan5 | TM | Monocyte | -0.631 | 0.631 | Gained |
| Adam17 | Il6ra | TM | Neutrophil | -0.628 | 0.628 | Gained |
| Adam17 | Rhbdf2 | TM | Monocyte | -0.621 | 0.621 | Gained |
| Tnfsf13b | Tnfrsf17 | HM_2 | Prolif | -0.601 | 0.601 | Gained |
| App | Cd74 | TM | TM | +0.580 | 0.580 | Lost |
| Gstp1 | Traf2 | DAM | TM | -0.569 | 0.569 | Gained |
| S100a9 | Cd68 | B_cell | B_cell | +0.565 | 0.565 | Lost |
| Ptdss1 | Jmjd6 | IFN | TM | -0.557 | 0.557 | Gained |
| Sema4d | Cd72 | TM | TM | +0.552 | 0.552 | Lost |
| Tnfsf13b | Tnfrsf17 | HM_2 | HM_1 | -0.549 | 0.549 | Gained |
| App | Cd74 | Neutrophil | TM | +0.548 | 0.548 | Lost |
| Adam10 | Cd44 | TM | B_cell | -0.548 | 0.548 | Gained |
| App | Cd74 | Prolif | TM | +0.537 | 0.537 | Lost |
| Copa | Cd74 | Monocyte | TM | +0.524 | 0.524 | Lost |
| Adam10 | Notch2 | TM | B_cell | -0.519 | 0.519 | Gained |
| Adam10 | Il6ra | TM | Neutrophil | -0.507 | 0.507 | Gained |
| S100a8 | Cd68 | B_cell | T_cell | +0.507 | 0.507 | Lost |
| App | Cd74 | FTM | TM | +0.498 | 0.498 | Lost |
| App | Cd74 | BAM | TM | +0.492 | 0.492 | Lost |
| Adam10 | Tspan17 | TM | HM_other | -0.488 | 0.488 | Gained |
| Tgfb1 | Lpp | Neutrophil | HM_other | +0.484 | 0.484 | Lost |
| Ptdss1 | Jmjd6 | BAM | TM | -0.448 | 0.448 | Gained |
| Tgfb1 | Acvrl1 | Neutrophil | IFN | +0.446 | 0.446 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Cd68 | B_cell | B_cell | +0.440 | 0.440 | Lost |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | TM | TM | +0.439 | 0.439 | Lost |
| App | Cd74 | HM_other | TM | +0.424 | 0.424 | Lost |
| Selplg | Itgb2 | BAM | TM | +0.423 | 0.423 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Itgb2 | B_cell | B_cell | +0.409 | 0.409 | Lost |
| App | Cd74 | Monocyte | TM | +0.400 | 0.400 | Lost |
| Tnfsf13b | Tnfrsf17 | HM_2 | DAM | -0.383 | 0.383 | Gained |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | DAM | TM | +0.379 | 0.379 | Lost |
| Ccl5 | Ccrl2 | Monocyte | IFN | -0.376 | 0.376 | Gained |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | BAM | TM | +0.368 | 0.368 | Lost |
| Tnfsf13b | Cd40 | HM_2 | FTM | -0.367 | 0.367 | Gained |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | HM_2 | TM | +0.366 | 0.366 | Lost |
| Selplg | Itgam | DAM | TM | +0.346 | 0.346 | Lost |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | FTM | TM | +0.338 | 0.338 | Lost |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | IFN | TM | +0.328 | 0.328 | Lost |
| S100a9 | Itgb2 | T_cell | TM | +0.325 | 0.325 | Lost |
| App | Cd74 | TM | Prolif | +0.311 | 0.311 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Itgb2 | DAM | TM | +0.303 | 0.303 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Cd36 | B_cell | BAM | +0.299 | 0.299 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Itgb2 | BAM | TM | +0.298 | 0.298 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Itgb2 | HM_2 | TM | +0.295 | 0.295 | Lost |
| S100a8 | Itgb2 | FTM | TM | +0.292 | 0.292 | Lost |
60 interactions: top 30 gained and top 30 lost by absolute ΔRank. Click column headers to sort.
Adam10→Trem2 Signaling Lost Novel
ADAM10-mediated TREM2 ectodomain shedding from TM to DAM is lost in ATG7-KO (ΔRank = +0.287). TREM2 cleavage is critical for DAM program activation and lipid sensing. This connects autophagy deficiency directly to the impaired TREM2 signaling axis in Alzheimer's disease.
Compensatory BAFF Signaling Novel
BAFF (Tnfsf13b→Tnfrsf17) emerges as a novel compensatory axis from HM_2 to DAM in ATG7-KO (ΔRank = −0.383). BAFF is typically a B cell survival factor; this microglia-to-microglia BAFF signaling may serve as a survival signal for signaling-impaired DAM cells, representing a potential therapeutic target.
Apoe→Lrp1 Lipid Supply Disrupted
Apoe→Lrp1 signaling from HM_2 to DAM is lost in KO (ΔRank = +0.115), providing cell-cell communication evidence for the cholesterol homeostasis pathway downregulation identified in GSEA (HALLMARK NES = −2.11). The lipid supply chain from homeostatic microglia to DAM is disrupted.
Cross-Dataset Validation
19
Shared DEGs
significant in both platforms
100%
Concordance
19/19 same direction, 0 discordant
0.22
Genome-wide r
Pearson, 11,842 genes
−0.921
Iron-MG rbc
FTM enrichment (padj ≈ 0)
Cross-validation of ATG7 effects between bulk RNA-seq (20-month FACS-sorted microglia) and scRNA-seq pseudobulk (5-month) across 11,842 shared genes reveals moderate but highly significant correlation (Pearson r = 0.22, p = 2.8 × 10⁻¹³⁰; Spearman ρ = 0.29). Among significant genes, correlation strengthens to r = 0.33. Of 19 DEGs shared between platforms, all 19 show perfect directional concordance (zero discordant), establishing a core age-independent ATG7 signature including Esr1, Cdkn1a, Blvrb, Sdf2l1, and Pdia5. Effects are moderately amplified at 20 months (median LFC ratio = 1.17). FTM signature validation confirms these cells score strongly on iron-MG consensus (rbc = −0.921) and MIMS-iron signatures, but not on ferroptosis signatures, establishing FTM as iron-homeostatic rather than ferroptotic.
Bulk vs scRNA-seq Log₂FC Correlation
Log₂FC comparison across platforms. Gold points: 19 genes significant in both (r = 0.87). Gray: 148 bulk-only DEGs. Blue: 22 scRNA-seq-only DEGs. Dashed line: regression through shared genes. All 19 shared DEGs fall in concordant quadrants (upper-right or lower-left).
FTM Signature Enrichment
FTM cells score strongly on iron-homeostatic signatures (green bars, *** = padj ≈ 0) but not on ferroptosis signatures (gray bars, NS). Effect size shown as −rank biserial correlation; positive values indicate FTM enrichment.
19 Cross-Validated DEGs
| Gene | Bulk log₂FC | SC log₂FC | Bulk padj ▲ | SC padj |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esr1 | +5.85 | +5.00 | 8.9e-288 | 2.9e-107 |
| Pla2g7 | +4.29 | +2.16 | 1.5e-124 | 7.1e-16 |
| Slc39a4 | +1.51 | +1.24 | 2.7e-10 | 3.6e-8 |
| A530064D06Rik | +2.97 | +2.20 | 7.6e-10 | 1.5e-26 |
| Osgin1 | +1.69 | +1.45 | 2.7e-9 | 2.6e-8 |
| Sdf2l1 | -1.48 | -1.00 | 1.4e-7 | 0.0004 |
| Blvrb | +1.16 | +1.25 | 5.2e-7 | 4.7e-19 |
| Gdf3 | +4.73 | +2.02 | 1.9e-6 | 6.3e-6 |
| Lyz1 | +2.34 | +2.86 | 2.5e-6 | 0.0472 |
| Gpr165 | -1.31 | -1.03 | 4.0e-6 | 0.0001 |
| Trpv4 | +1.23 | +1.05 | 1.3e-5 | 1.7e-6 |
| Tmem205 | +1.28 | +1.24 | 5.1e-5 | 4.4e-18 |
| Cdkn1a | +1.42 | +1.62 | 0.0002 | 4.4e-14 |
| Gstm1 | +1.26 | +1.36 | 0.0003 | 1.4e-14 |
| Dnase1l3 | +1.38 | +1.17 | 0.0004 | 0.0027 |
| Il18bp | +1.45 | +1.48 | 0.0069 | 4.8e-21 |
| Pdia5 | -1.22 | -1.02 | 0.0095 | 2.5e-5 |
| Clec4n | +3.62 | +1.16 | 0.0180 | 0.0099 |
| Tnfaip2 | +1.03 | +1.99 | 0.0458 | 4.7e-20 |
Perfect Cross-Platform Concordance
All 19 shared DEGs between 5-month scRNA-seq and 20-month bulk RNA-seq show identical direction of change, with zero discordant genes across all 5 cross-dataset comparisons. This establishes a robust core ATG7 signature — including UPR impairment (Sdf2l1, Pdia5), iron metabolism (Blvrb), senescence (Cdkn1a), and estrogen receptor (Esr1) — conserved across ages and technologies.
FTM: Iron-Homeostatic, Not FerroptoticNovel
FTM cells score strongly on MIMS-iron and Iron-MG consensus signatures (rbc = −0.921) but not on ferroptosis signatures (FAS: NS, FerrDb: NS). Despite being labeled "ferritin microglia," their iron storage program is protective (anti-ferroptotic) rather than pathological. Fth1/Ftl1 are expressed in 99.6% of all cells and cannot discriminate FTM; Blvrb is the true marker.
ATG7: The Iron/Ferroptosis SwitchNovel
ATG7 loss increases ferroptosis scores in FTM (FAS padj = 3.9× 10⁻⁶) without altering iron-homeostatic identity (Iron-MG consensus: NS). This dissociation reveals autophagy as the switch between protective iron storage and ferroptotic vulnerability — impaired ferritinophagy converts sequestered iron into a source of toxic free iron. The effect is even stronger in DAM (FAS padj = 6.3 × 10⁻⁵¹).
Non-Microglia Immune Remodeling
32,340
Non-Microglia Cells
35.7% of total
0.55
Neutrophil OR
45% depleted in KO (padj ≈ 0)
1.76
T Cell OR
76% enriched in KO (padj ≈ 0)
5/6
Types with DEGs
216–927 DEGs per type
Among 32,340 non-microglia cells (35.7% of total), ATG7 deficiency in microglia reshapes the entire brain immune milieu through non-cell-autonomous effects. The reciprocal neutrophil depletion (OR=0.55) and T cell enrichment (OR=1.76) reveal a fundamental shift in peripheral immune cell recruitment. Monocytes, B cells, and BAMs are ATG7-neutral, demonstrating pathway-specific rather than general inflammatory remodeling. The disease (5xFAD) effect is independently powerful: neutrophil enrichment (OR=1.71) and BAM depletion (OR=0.64).
Non-Microglia Composition by Genotype
Percentage composition of 6 non-microglia cell types across genotype groups. Neutrophils dominate in Atg7fl/fl-5xFAD (37.8%) but are reduced in Atg7_dMG groups. T cells expand from ~19% in WT to ~28% in KO backgrounds.
Differentially Expressed Genes per Cell Type
Number of significant DEGs (KO vs WT, Wilcoxon test, top 30 per type shown) split by direction. Monocytes show the most DEGs (927), followed by neutrophils (492). Red = upregulated in KO, blue = downregulated.
Composition Tests: ATG7 and Disease Effects
| Cell Type | Cells | OR (ATG7) ↓ | padj (ATG7) | OR (5xFAD) | padj (5xFAD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T cells | 7,525 | 1.756 | 4.1e-100 | 0.702 | 1.1e-40 |
| Other myeloid | 3,906 | 1.144 | 1.2e-4 | 0.601 | 5.2e-49 |
| B cells | 4,750 | 1.023 | 0.562 | 1.270 | 7.4e-14 |
| Monocytes | 5,175 | 0.996 | 0.928 | 1.063 | 0.060 |
| BAMs | 2,097 | 0.995 | 0.928 | 0.640 | 2.4e-22 |
| Neutrophils | 8,887 | 0.549 | 2.1e-122 | 1.712 | 2.9e-100 |
Fisher's exact test for composition differences. OR > 1 = enriched in KO (ATG7 column) or 5xFAD (Disease column). Significant results (padj < 0.05) highlighted. T cells and neutrophils show the strongest and most significant ATG7 effects.
Non-Cell-Autonomous Immune ControlNovel
Microglia-specific ATG7 deletion indirectly depletes brain neutrophils by 45% while enriching T cells by 76%, revealing that microglial autophagy status controls the broader brain immune landscape. The selectivity is remarkable: monocytes, B cells, and BAMs are ATG7-neutral, indicating specific chemokine/cytokine pathways mediate this remodeling rather than general inflammatory changes.
Neutrophil Phenotype SwitchNovel
Remaining brain neutrophils in ATG7-KO upregulate MHC-I (B2m +0.62, H2-K1 +1.03, H2-D1 +0.42) while downregulating antimicrobial effectors (Tspo −0.96, Ifitm6 −1.08, Prok2 −2.29), indicating a shift from effector to antigen-presenting phenotype — consistent with the paradoxical gain of outgoing signaling despite numerical depletion (see Cell Communication).
Mechanistic Synthesis
30
Total Findings
Across 5 analysis tracks
17
Novel (Orthogonal)
Not reported in original paper
11
Extends Literature
Builds on known findings
22
High Confidence
8 medium confidence
Central Mechanistic Model
Microglia-specific ATG7 deletion triggers a cascading failure across multiple biological systems. The primary mechanism is UPR impairment (especially the ATF6 arm), which creates a 'double vulnerability': cells simultaneously lose proteostasis protection AND gain ferroptotic susceptibility. In DAM cells, this manifests as a 'signaling desert' where 8 growth/survival pathways shut down, leaving only p53 and TNFa active — consistent with cells transitioning toward death rather than productive activation. This internal crisis is compounded by communication isolation (2:1 loss ratio of intercellular signals), loss of critical Adam10→Trem2 and Apoe→Lrp1 axes, and non-cell-autonomous immune remodeling (45% neutrophil depletion, 76% T cell enrichment). Importantly, ATG7 and 5xFAD effects are statistically ADDITIVE, not synergistic — the amplified disease response arises from combined additive effects rather than true biological interaction.
Novelty Classification
Of 30 findings, 17 are entirely novel (orthogonal to existing literature), 11 extend known biology, and 2 confirm previous reports.
Confidence Distribution
22 findings are supported by high-confidence evidence (multiple methods, strong statistics), while 8 are medium confidence (single method or smaller effect sizes).
Integrative Themes
UPR-Ferroptosis Double Vulnerability(5 findings)
UPR impairment (especially ATF6) and ferroptosis susceptibility are anti-correlated at the single-cell level, creating coordinated vulnerability
DAM Signaling Desert & Communication Isolation(5 findings)
DAM cells experience coordinated shutdown of growth/survival pathways and lose twice as many intercellular interactions as they gain
Non-Functional Overexpression Pattern(2 findings)
Esr1 gene massively upregulated but TF activity paradoxically down; similar disconnect in JAK-STAT (gene up, signaling down)
Homeostatic Microglia Bifurcation(3 findings)
ATG7 loss splits homeostatic microglia into hyperactive (depleted) and senescent (accumulating) sub-populations with distinct signaling profiles
Non-Cell-Autonomous Immune Remodeling(3 findings)
Microglia-intrinsic autophagy loss remodels the brain immune landscape with selective cell type effects
Additive Biology with Pathway Saturation(2 findings)
Gene-level effects are additive but translation/ribosome pathways show sub-additivity, suggesting compensatory capacity saturation
All Findings (30 of 30)
| ID ↑ | Track | Category | Finding | Novelty | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F01 | T1 | Cell Type Identification | 27 clusters at resolution 0.8 resolve 6 HM sub-clusters, DAM, FTM, IFN, TM, Prolif, plus non-microglia (T cells, B cells, neutrophils, monocytes, BAMs) | Extends | high |
| F02 | T1 | Cell Type Identification | FTM identification requires Blvrb as discriminator — Fth1/Ftl1 expressed in 99.6% of all cells | Extends | high |
| F03 | T1 | Data Quality | Bulk RNA-seq sample wt3 is a clear outlier (1.26M reads, 27x lower depth) requiring exclusion | Novel | high |
| F04 | T2 | Trajectory | FTM connects most strongly to TM (PAGA w=0.27), not to HM or DAM, suggesting FTM derives from transitional microglia | Novel | medium |
| F05 | T2 | Trajectory | ATG7 affects DAM proportion but not DAM pseudotime position — cells entering DAM follow normal trajectory | Extends | medium |
| F06 | T2 | Gene Dynamics | UPR pseudotime gradient abolished in KO: WT microglia modulate UPR along activation but KO do not | Extends | high |
| F07 | T2 | Differential Abundance | Homeostatic microglia bifurcation: HM_1 depleted (logFC=-2.00) while HM_2 enriched (+1.21) in ATG7-KO | Novel | high |
| F08 | T2 | Differential Abundance | Neutrophils depleted in ATG7-KO brains (logFC=-1.01), indicating non-cell-autonomous effects of microglia autophagy loss | Novel | high |
| F09 | T3 | Differential Expression | Esr1 is the most dramatically upregulated gene in ATG7-KO microglia (log2FC=5.0 at 5mo, 5.85 at 20mo) | Novel | high |
| F10 | T3 | Differential Expression | UPR genes (Calr, Hspa5) confirmed as top downregulated genes across all comparisons | Confirms | high |
| F11 | T3 | Differential Expression | Disease response amplified 2.4x in KO background (146 vs 60 DEGs) with only 15 shared genes | Extends | high |
| F12 | T3 | Pathway Enrichment | Ferroptosis pathway significantly enriched in ATG7-KO DAM with co-enriched glutathione metabolism | Confirms | high |
| F13 | T3 | Pathway Enrichment | Cholesterol homeostasis specifically downregulated in ATG7-KO DAM (NES=-2.11) but not HM | Extends | high |
| F14 | T3 | Temporal Dynamics | Progressive senescence: p21/Cdkn1a at both ages, p16/Cdkn2a emerging only at 20 months | Extends | high |
| F15 | T3 | Interaction Analysis | ATG7 × 5xFAD interaction is statistically ADDITIVE at gene level (zero interaction genes at FDR<0.1) | Novel | high |
| F16 | T3 | Signature Scoring | Ferroptosis and UPR are anti-correlated at single-cell level, creating 'double vulnerability' in KO | Novel | medium |
| F17 | T4 | TF Activity | ATF6 arm is the most severely affected UPR branch (not IRE1/XBP1 or PERK/ATF4 as typically focused) | Extends | high |
| F18 | T4 | TF Activity | Esr1 TF ACTIVITY paradoxically DOWN despite massive GENE upregulation — non-functional overexpression | Novel | medium |
| F19 | T4 | TF Activity | Spi1/PU.1 myeloid master regulator down in 8/11 microglia subtypes — impaired myeloid identity | Extends | high |
| F20 | T4 | TF Activity | MHC-II TF regulators (RFXAP/RFXANK/RFX5) strongly reduced in DAM — upstream regulatory evidence for impaired antigen presentation | Novel | high |
| F21 | T4 | Pathway Activity | DAM 'signaling desert': 8 growth/survival pathways down, only p53 and TNFa up | Novel | high |
| F22 | T4 | Pathway Activity | HM bifurcation explained mechanistically: HM_1 = hyperactive signaling (MAPK/PI3K), HM_2 = senescent (p53/NFkB) | Novel | high |
| F23 | T4 | Cell Communication | DAM cells lose 2x more interactions than gain (42 lost vs 21 gained) — communication isolation | Novel | high |
| F24 | T4 | Cell Communication | Adam10→Trem2 (TM→DAM) lost — impaired TREM2 ectodomain shedding connects autophagy to TREM2 axis | Novel | medium |
| F25 | T4 | Cell Communication | Compensatory BAFF signaling (Tnfsf13b→Tnfrsf17) emerges HM_2→DAM in KO | Novel | medium |
| F26 | T5 | Cross-Validation | 19 DEGs shared between 5mo scRNA-seq and 20mo bulk with perfect directional concordance (0 discordant) | Extends | high |
| F27 | T5 | Cell Type Characterization | FTM is iron-homeostatic, NOT ferroptotic — autophagy is the switch to ferroptotic vulnerability | Extends | high |
| F28 | T5 | Cell Type Characterization | Two distinct ferroptotic mechanisms: DAM (failed iron homeostasis) vs FTM (iron overload from impaired ferritinophagy) | Novel | medium |
| F29 | T5 | Non-Microglia Effects | Microglia-specific ATG7 loss depletes neutrophils 45% and enriches T cells 76% — non-cell-autonomous immune remodeling | Novel | high |
| F30 | T5 | Non-Microglia Effects | Neutrophils shift from effector to MHC-I-upregulated phenotype in KO brains | Novel | medium |
Complete catalogue of 30 findings across 5 analysis tracks. Click column headers to sort. Use filter buttons to focus on specific novelty categories.
Methods Note
This synthesis integrates results from 5 analysis tracks: T1 (Quality & Cell Atlas), T2 (Trajectory & Dynamics), T3 (Differential Expression & Pathways), T4 (Regulatory Networks & Communication), and T5 (Cross-Validation & Integration). Novelty classification compares each finding against the original publication (Cai et al. 2025, JEM) and existing literature. Confidence is based on effect size, statistical significance, cross-method validation, and biological plausibility. Findings are classified as orthogonal (completely novel), extends (builds on known findings with new detail), or confirms (independently validates published results).
This report was generated with the assistance of AI. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, AI can make mistakes — please verify key findings against primary data before drawing conclusions.